Surgical treatment for hyperhidrosis causes hyperhidrosis...

Localised hyperhidrosis may also be due to:

▪ Stroke

▪ Spinal nerve damage

▪ Peripheral nerve damage

▪ Surgical sympathectomy

▪ Neuropathy

▪ Brain tumour

▪ Chronic anxiety disorder

http://www.dermnet.org.nz/hair-nails-sweat/hyperhidrosis.html

Sympathectomy to treat the urge to smoke

Lipov, Eugene (Chicago, IL, US)  treating addiction with disruption of the sympathetic chain.

http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2007/0135871.html

Complications of surgical (Thoracic and Lumbar) Sympathectomy

Post-sympathectomy neuralgia - pain overlying the scapula

Compensatory sweating - involving the lover back or face

Pneumothorax

Bleeding due to azygos vein or intercostal artery injury

Winged scapula due to long thoracic nerve injury (p. 517)

Mastery of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery

Gerald B. Zelenock, Thomas S. Huber, Louis M. Messina, Alan B. Lumsden, Gregory L. Moneta

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 15/12/2005 - 900 pages

The custom of a majority is no guarantee of safety and is seldom a guide to best medical practice.

Cameron`s claim that there has been only one death attributable to synchronous bilateral thoracoscopic sympathectomy is implausible. Surgeons and anaesthetists are reticent in publicizing such events and Civil Law Reports of settled cases are an inadequate measure of the current running total. The custom of a majority is no guarantee of safety and is seldom a guide to best medical practice.

Jack Collin,

Consultant Surgeon

Oxford

http://www.bmj.com/content/320/7244/1221?tab=responses

reduction in all proline-richproteins (PRP) in the saliva following sympathectomy

The protein constituents in parasympathetically evoked saliva from normal and short-term sympathectomized parotid gland swere compared. There was a reduction in all proline-richproteins (PRP) in the saliva following sympathectomy. The decrease was quantified for acidic PRP by high- performance ion-exchange chromatography, which showed an increase in the ratio of amylase to other proteins. These results suggest that sympathetic impulses influence the synthesis of PRP and amylase in opposite directions. 

Quarterly Journal ofExperimental Physiology (1988) 73, 139-142

No compensatory sweating after botulinum toxin... [Br J Dermatol. 2005] - PubMed - NCBI

No compensatory sweating after botulinum toxin... [Br J Dermatol. 2005] - PubMed - NCBI: "No compensatory sweating after botulinum toxin treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis"

'via Blog this'

patient information must include the long-term substantial risk for sever CS and regret of the procedure.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22191130

Another case of disabled thermoregulation and heatstroke following sympathectomy

We describe an extreme case of compensatory truncal hyper- hidrosis and anhidrosis over the head and neck region which led to a heatstroke. 

Six months after the initial operation, he had an episode of heatstroke while perform- ing outdoor duties which required running for around 5 km. The temperature on the day was between 30–32°C, and the relative humidity was between 75 and 85%. At that time, he complained of light-headedness, ‘feeling’ that heat could not dissipate from his head and neck region and muscle cramp in his legs. He was transferred to a hospital and was found to have a body tem- perature of 40°C and shock. His presentation was similar to a previous report by Sihoe et al. [1] on a patient with post- sympathectomy heatstroke. He was subsequently successfully treated with fluid and electrolyte resuscitation and supportive care.
  

Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery 14 (2012) 350–352

no chance for nerve regeneration as early as 10 days after clipping

*Study presented at the 9th Biannual International Society for Sympathetic Surgery Conference in Odense, Denmark in May 2011. 

www.tswj.com/aip/134547.pdf

69% of patients continued to have relief after ETS, patient satisfaction rate was 56%

There were no operative mortalities, minor complications occurred in 22%. Initial success rate was 88%. Median follow up was 93 (24-168) months, response rate to the questionnaire was 85%. Sixty-nine per cent of patients continued to have relief of initial symptoms, whereas patient satisfaction rate was 56%. CS was present in 42 patients (68%). Long-term satisfaction rates per initial indication group were 42% for facial blushing and 65% for hyperhidrosis (n.s.), and CS was present in 79% vs 61%, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

ETS appears a safe treatment for upper limb hyperhydrosis with acceptable long-term results. For excessive blushing, however, long-term satifaction rates of ETS are severely hampered by a high incidence of disturbing compensatory sweating. ETS should only be indicated in patients with unbearable symptoms refractory to non-surgical treatment. The patient information must include the long-term substantial risk for sever CS and regret of the procedure.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22191130

"sympathectomy highlighted the disparity between what is known in practice and what appears in the literature"

The March 2004 edition was quite outstanding, with an excellent editorial reminding the reader that only good results are published. The review on thoracoscopic sympathectomy highlighted the disparity between what is known in practice and what appears in the literature. 

‘Know Your Results’, the topic of the ASGBI Annual Scientific Meeting, is of outstanding importance; what is more, the surgeon has to go on knowing his/her results to ensure standards of practice do not slip.

The Journal appreciates comments and criticism and the correspondence column remains a crucial part of the BJS in its interaction between editors and reader. It is also part of the scientific process.

A more robust and incisive criticism of articles known to be flawed would prevent the retractions that have recently been published in the Lancet.

Christopher Russell, Chairman, BJS Society

Association of Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, ANNUAL REPORT 2004

Publications authored by prolific ETS surgeons should be carefully examined and compared

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Sep;78(3):1052­5.

Selective division of T3 rami communicantes (T3 ramicotomy) in the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis.

Lee DY, Kim DH, Paik HC.
Respiratory Center, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Yongdong Severance Hospital, Yonsei

University College of Medicine, Seoul, People's Republic of China. dylee@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Compensatory sweating (CS) is the main cause of a patient's dissatisfaction after sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis.Preservation of the sympathetic nerve trunk and limitations on the range of dissection are necessary to reduce CS.

METHODS: We compared 64 patients (31 male, 33 female) (group 1) who underwent a T2 sympathicotomy between July 1998 and February 1999 and 83 patients (58 male, 25 female) (group 2) who underwent a T3 ramicotomy between August 2000 and December 2002.

RESULTS: In group 1, 60 patients (93.8%) exhibited a decreased sweating on both hands, but 4 patients (6.2%) exhibited a persistent sweating on both hands. For group 2, 58 patients (69.9%) experienced a decreased sweating on both hands, 15 patients (18.1%) experienced a persistent sweating on both hands, and 10 patients (12.0%) experienced a persistent sweating on one hand. The grade of CS in group 2 was significantly lower than in group 1 (p < 0.001) and, notably, the rate of embarrassing and disabling CS in group 2 (15.5% [9 out of 58]) was significantly lower than in group 1 (43.3% [26 out of 60], p value < 0.001). The rate of satisfaction was 78.1% (50 out of 64) for group 1 and 68.6% (57 out of 83) for group 2 with no significant statistical difference indicated (p = 0.202).

CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of sweating postoperatively was relatively high in the T3 ramicotomy group, although the T3 surgery did result in a lower incidence of CS when compared with a T2 sympathicotomy.

PMID: 15337046 [PubMed ­ indexed for MEDLINE]

Publication Types, MeSH Terms LinkOut ­ more resources

II.

Surg Today. 2012 Jul 15. [Epub ahead of print]

A comparison between two types of limited sympathetic surgery for palmar hyperhidrosis.

Hwang JJ, Kim DH, Hong YJ, Lee DY.
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Eulji University Hospital, Daejeon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Endoscopic thoracic sympathetic surgery is effective for treating palmar hyperhidrosis, although compensatory sweating (CS) is a significant and annoying side effect. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of limited resection at two different locations.

METHODS: From May 2004 to June 2009, T3 sympathicotomy (group I) was performed in 46 patients and T3,4 ramicotomy (group II) was performed in 43 patients during the same period. T3 sympathicotomy (group I) and T3,4 ramicotomy (group II) were performed during the same period. Using questionnaires, completed by the patients, the satisfaction rates and grades of CS were analyzed.

RESULTS: No significant differences in age distribution or sex ratios were observed between the two groups. The satisfaction rate was 91.3 % in group I and 79.1 % in group II. The operation time was 19.8 (±6.6) min (sic!) in group I, and 51.6 (±18.8) min in group II, showing a statistically significant difference (p < 0.002). The incidence of persistent hand sweating in group II (16.3 %) was higher than that observed in group I (2.2 %). The incidence of compensatory sweating on the lower extremities was higher in group II (37.2 %) than in group I (10.9 %).

CONCLUSIONS: Although ramicotomy is considered to be an effective method for treating hyperhidrosis and has a theoretical advantage of allowing greater anatomical resection, it requires longer operation time and induces more severe compensatory sweating in the lower limbs resulting in reduced satisfaction rates.

PMID: 22798011 [PubMed ­ as supplied by publisher]

sympathectomy induced morphological alterations in the masseter muscles

Sympathectomized animals showed varying degrees of metabolic and morphological alterations, especially 18 months after sympathectomy. The first five groups showed a higher frequency of type I fibres, whilst the oldest group showed a higher frequency of type IIb fibres. In the oldest group, a significant variation in fibre diameter was observed. Many fibres showed small diameter, atrophy, hypertrophy, splitting, and necrosis. Areas with fibrosis were observed. Thus cervical sympathectomy induced morphological alterations in the masseter muscles. These alterations were, in part, similar to both denervation and myopathy. These findings indicate that sympathetic innervation contributes to the maintenance of the morphological and metabolic features of masseter muscle fibres.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11454103

Bilateral cervical sympathectomies should be avoided because of the destruction of cardioaccelerator tone

http://www.hiesiger.com/physicians/physicianrfl.html

SURGICAL SYMPATHECTOMY ON THE SENSITIVITY TO EPINEPHRINE OF THE BLOOD VESSELS OF MUSCULAR SEGMENTS OF THE LIMBS

Pursuing this study of the effect of epinephrine on muscle blood flow, Duff and Swan (10) reported that during intravenous epinephrine infusions the initial marked dilatation was succeeded by a second phase of moderate dilatation in normal but not in sympathectomized limbs. Because of its absence in chronically sympathectomized limbs this secondary vasodilatation was at that time thought to be an indirect vasomotor effect mediated by the sympathetic nerves. Re-examination of their data in the light of some subsequent critical experiments now reveals that the difference which they found between normal and sympathectomized limbs may be ascribed largely to vascular hypersensitivity in the later.

In the present paper these additional data are reported, and are incorporated with those of Duff and Swan(10); the whole material being interpreted to provide evidence that hypersensitivity of the vessels of skeletal muscle in the upper and lower limbs may result from pre- and postganglionic sympathectomy in man.

EFFECT OF SURGICAL SYMPATHECTOMY ON THE SENSITIVITY TO EPINEPHRINE OF THE BLOOD VESSELS OF MUSCULAR SEGMENTS OF THE LIMBS, ROBERT S. DUFF

J Clin Invest. 1953 September; 32(9): 851–857.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC438413/

Nerve regeneration commonly occurs following both surgical of chemical sympathectomy

Sympathectomy is a destructive procedure that interrupts the sympathetic nervous system. Chemical sympathectomies use alcohol or phenol injections to destroy sympathetic nervous tissue (the so‐called "sympathetic chain" of nerve ganglia). Surgical ablation can be performed by open removal or electrocoagulation (destruction of tissue with high‐frequency electrical current) of the sympathetic chain, or minimally invasive procedures using thermal or laser interruption. 

Nerve regeneration commonly occurs following both surgical of chemical ablation, but may take longer with surgical ablation.

This systematic review found only one small study (20 participants) of good methodological quality, which reported no significant difference between surgical and chemical sympathectomy for relieving neuropathic pain. Potentially serious complications of sympathectomy are well documented in the literature, and one (neuralgia) occurred in this study. 

The practice of sympathectomy for treating neuropathic pain is based on very weak evidence. Furthermore, complications of the procedure may be significant.

Authors' conclusions: The practice of surgical and chemical sympathectomy for neuropathic pain and CRPS is based on very little high quality evidence. Sympathectomy should be used cautiously in clinical practice, in carefully selected patients, and probably only after failure of other treatment options.

Editorial Group: Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Group.

Publication status: New search for studies and content updated (conclusions changed).

Citation: Straube S, Derry S, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. Cervico‐thoracic or lumbar sympathectomy for neuropathic pain and complex regional pain syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD002918. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002918.pub2. Link to Cochrane Library. [PubMed]

Copyright © 2010 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0011684/